Список литературы

  1. Алексеев Е. Р., Головатин Д. Т., Коваленко Ю. С., Чуракова Ю. Р. Открытый подход к построению научного программного обеспечения // Современные информационные технологии и ИТ-образование. 2025. Т. 21, № 4. Режим доступа: http://sitito.cs.msu.ru/index.php/SITITO/article/view/1273 (дата обращения: 31.03.2026).
  2. Воронцов К. В., Игловиков В. И., Стрижов В. В., Устюжанин А. Е., Хританков А. С. Проблемы проведения экспериментов и воспроизводимости исследований в науках о данных // Труды Московского физико-технического института. 2021. Т. 13, № 2. С. 100–108. Режим доступа: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-provedeniya-eksperimentov-i-vosproizvodimosti-issledovaniy-v-naukah-o-dannyh (дата обращения: 31.03.2026).
  3. Шевченко Л. Б. Опыт ГПНТБ СО РАН по исследованию открытых инструментов для поддержки научных исследований // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2023. Т. 5, № 3. С. 159–168. Режим доступа: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.3.10 (дата обращения: 31.03.2026).
  4. AlNoamany Y., Borghi J. A. (2018) Towards computational reproducibility: Researcher perspectives on the use and sharing of software. PeerJ Computer Science 4: e163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.163.
  5. Anzt H., Bach F., Druskat S., Löffler F., Loewe A., Renard B. Y., Seemann G., Struck A., Achhammer E., Aggarwal P., Appel F., Bader M., Brusch L., Busse C., Chourdakis G., Dabrowski P. W., Ebert P., Flemisch B., Friedl S., Fritzsch B., Funk M. D., Gast V., Goth F., Grad J.-N., Hermann S., Hohmann F., Janosch S., Kutra D., Linxweiler J., Muth T., Peters-Kottig W., Rack F., Raters F. H., Rave S., Reina G., Reißig M., Ropinski T., Schaarschmidt J., Seibold H., Thiele J. P., Uekermann B., Unger S., Weeber R. (2020) An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: Current state, open challenges, and call for action. F1000Research 9: 295. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23224.1.
  6. Barker M., Chue Hong N. P., Katz D. S., Lamprecht A.-L., Martinez-Ortiz C., Psomopoulos F., Harrow J., Castro L. J., Gruenpeter M., Martinez P. A., Honeyman T. (2022) Introducing the FAIR principles for research software. Scientific Data 9 (1): 622. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01710-x.
  7. Barker M., Cohen J., Hernández Serrano P., Katz D. S., Martin K., Rudmann D., Shanahan H. (2025) Institutional policy pathways for supporting research software: Global trends and local practices. arXiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.26422. Препринт.
  8. Carlin D., Rainer A., Wilson D. (2023) Where is all the research software? An analysis of software in UK academic repositories. PeerJ Computer Science 9: e1546. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1546.
  9. Carver J. C., Weber N., Ram K., Gesing S., Katz D. S. (2022) A survey of the state of the practice for research software in the United States. PeerJ Computer Science 8: e963. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.963.
  10. Chassanoff A., AlNoamany Y., Thornton K., Borghi J. (2018) Software curation in research libraries: Practice and promise. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 6 (1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2239.
  11. Chassanoff A., Altman M. (2020) Curation as “Interoperability with the future”: Preserving scholarly research software in academic libraries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71 (3): 325–337. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24244.
  12. Christian T.-M., Gooch A., Vision T., Hull E. (2020) Journal data policies: Exploring how the understanding of editors and authors corresponds to the policies themselves. PLOS ONE 15 (3): e0230281. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230281.
  13. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2024) Umgang mit Forschungssoftware im Förderhandeln der DFG [Handling of research software in the DFG’s funding activities]. Bonn: DFG. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13919790.
  14. Di Cosmo R., Gruenpeter M., Marmol B., Monteil A., Romary L., Sadowska J. (2020) Curated archiving of research software artifacts: Lessons learned from the French open archive (HAL). International Journal of Digital Curation 15 (1): 16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.698.
  15. Druskat S., Bertuch O., Juckeland G., Knodel O., Schlauch T. (2022) Software publications with rich metadata: State of the art, automated workflows and HERMES concept. arXiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.09015. Препринт.
  16. Druskat S., Bertuch O., Struck A. (2023) Towards research software-ready libraries: Forschungssoftware in Bibliotheken. ABI Technik 43 (3): 168–178. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2023-0031.
  17. Fišar M., Greiner B., Huber C., Katok E., Ozkes A. I., and the Management Science Reproducibility Collaboration (2024) Reproducibility in Management Science. Management Science 70 (3): 1343–1356. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03556.
  18. Garijo D., Ménager H., Hwang L., Trisovic A., Hucka M., Morrell T., Allen A., Task Force on Best Practices for Software Registries, SciCodes Consortium (2022) Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories. PeerJ Computer Science 8: e1023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023.
  19. Gruenpeter M., Katz D. S., Lamprecht A.-L., Honeyman T., Garijo D., Struck A., Niehues A., Martinez P. A., Castro L. J., Rabemanantsoa T., Chue Hong N. P., Martinez-Ortiz C., Sesink L., Liffers M., Fouilloux A. C., Erdmann C., Peroni S., Martinez Lavanchy P., Todorov I., Sinha M. (2021) Defining research software: A controversial discussion. Zenodo. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5504016.
  20. Hardwicke T. E., Mathur M. B., MacDonald K., Nilsonne G., Banks G. C., Kidwell M. C., Hofelich Mohr A., Clayton E., Yoon E. J., Henry Tessler M., Lenne R. L., Altman S., Long B., Frank M. C. (2018) Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: Evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition. Royal Society Open Science 5 (8): 180448. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180448.
  21. Hasselbring W., Carr L., Hettrick S., Packer H., Tiropanis T. (2020) From FAIR research data toward FAIR and open research software. it – Information Technology 62 (1): 39–47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2019-0040.
  22. Hasselbring W., Druskat S., Bernoth J., Betker P., Felderer M., Ferenz S., Hermann B., Lamprecht A.-L., Linxweiler J., Prat A., Rumpe B., Schöning-Stierand K., Yang S. (2025) Multidimensional research software categorization. Computing in Science & Engineering 27 (2): 59–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2025.3555023.
  23. Hinsen K. (2019) Dealing with software collapse. Computing in Science & Engineering 21 (3): 104–108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2900945.
  24. Howison J., Bullard J. (2016) Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (9): 2137–2155. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23538.
  25. Hrynaszkiewicz I., Birukou A., Astell M., Swaminathan S., Kenall A., Khodiyar V. (2017) Standardising and harmonising research data policy in scholarly publishing. International Journal of Digital Curation 12 (1): 65–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v12i1.531.
  26. Hsieh H.-F., Shannon S. E. (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
  27. Ivimey-Cook E. R., Sánchez-Tójar A., Berberi I., Culina A., Roche D. G., Almeida R. A., Amin B., Bairos-Novak K. R., Balti H., Bertram M. G., Bliard L., Byrne I., Chan Y.-C., Cioffi W. R., Corbel Q., Elsy A. D., Florko K. R. N., Gould E., Grainger M. J., Harshbarger A. E., Hovstad K. A., Martin J. M., Martinig A. R., Masoero G., Moodie I. R., Moreau D., O’Dea R. E., Paquet M., Pick J. L., Rizvi T., Silva I., Szabo B., Takola E., Thoré E. S. J., Verberk W. C. E. P., Windecker S. M., Winter G., Zajková Z., Zeiss R., Moran N. P. (2025) From policy to practice: Progress towards data- and code-sharing in ecology and evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 292 (2055): 20251394. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1394.
  28. Jensen E. A., Katz D. S. (2024) Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey. F1000Research 13: 1447. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155879.1.
  29. Jiménez R. C., Kuzak M., Alhamdoosh M., Barker M., Batut B., Borg M., Capella-Gutiérrez S., Chue Hong N. P., Cook M., Corpas M., Flannery M., Garcia L., Gelpí J. L., Gladman S., Goble C., González Ferreiro M., Gonzalez-Beltran A., Griffin P. C., Grüning B., Hagberg J., Holub P., Hooft R., Ison J., Katz D. S., Leskošek B., López Gómez F., Oliveira L. J., Mellor D., Mosbergen R., Mulder N., Perez-Riverol Y., Pergl R., Pichler H., Pope B., Sanz F., Schneider M. V., Stodden V., Suchecki R., Svobodová Vařeková R., Talvik H.-A., Todorov I., Treloar A., Tyagi S., van Gompel M., Vaughan D., Via A., Wang X., Watson-Haigh N. S., Crouch S. (2017) Four simple recommendations to encourage best practices in research software. F1000Research 6: 876. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11407.1.
  30. Jones C. M., Matthews B., Gent I., Griffin T., Tedds J. (2017) Persistent identification and citation of software. International Journal of Digital Curation 11 (2): 104–114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v11i2.422.
  31. Katz D. S., Chue Hong N. P. (2018) Software citation in theory and practice. In: Mathematical Software – ICMS 2018. Cham: Springer, pp. 289–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96418-8_34.
  32. Katz D. S., Gruenpeter M., Honeyman T. (2021) Taking a fresh look at FAIR for research software. Patterns 2 (3): 100222. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100222.
  33. Koch T., Gläser D., Seeland A., Roy S., Schulze K., Weishaupt K., Boehringer D., Hermann S., Flemisch B. (2023) A sustainable infrastructure concept for improved accessibility, reusability, and archival of research software. arXiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.12830. Препринт.
  34. Lamprecht A.-L., Garcia L., Kuzak M., Martinez C., Arcila R., Martín del Pico E., Dominguez Del Angel V., van de Sandt S., Ison J., Martinez P. A., McQuilton P., Valencia A., Harrow J., Psomopoulos F., Gelpí J. L., Chue Hong N. P., Goble C., Capella-Gutiérrez S. (2020) Towards FAIR principles for research software. Data Science 3 (1): 37–59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3233/ds-190026.
  35. Lee B. D. (2018) Ten simple rules for documenting scientific software. PLOS Computational Biology 14 (12): e1006561. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006561.
  36. Li W., Liu X., Zhang Q., Shi L., Zhang J.-X., Zhang X., Luan J., Li Y., Xu T., Zhang R., Han X., Lei J., Wang X., Wang Y., Lan H., Chen X., Wu Y., Wu Y., Xia L., Liao H., Shen C., Yu Y., Xu X., Deng C., Liu P., Feng Z., Huang C.-J., Chen Z. (2024) Questionable practices in data and code sharing policy in high-profile medical journal and research. medRxiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.29.24312818. Препринт.
  37. Malviya-Thakur A., Milewicz R., Jahanshahi M., Paganini L., Vasilescu B., Mockus A. (2025) Scientific open-source software is less likely to become abandoned than one might think! Lessons from curating a catalog of maintained scientific software. Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering 2 (FSE): 2216–2239. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3729369.
  38. Mangul S., Mosqueiro T., Abdill R. J., Duong D., Mitchell K., Sarwal V., Hill B., Brito J., Littman R. J., Statz B., Lam A. K.-M., Dayama G., Grieneisen L., Martin L. S., Flint J., Eskin E., Blekhman R. (2019) Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools. PLOS Biology 17 (6): e3000333. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000333.
  39. Martín del Pico E., Gelpí J. L., Capella-Gutiérrez S. (2024) FAIRsoft – a practical implementation of FAIR principles for research software. Bioinformatics 40 (8): btae464. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae464.
  40. McKiernan E. C., Barba L., Bourne P. E., Carter C., Chandler Z., Choudhury S., Jacobs S., Katz D. S., Lieggi S., Plale B., Tananbaum G. (2023) Policy recommendations to ensure that research software is openly accessible and reusable. PLOS Biology 21 (7): e3002204. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002204.
  41. Moulaison Sandy H., Million A. J., Hudson-Vitale C. (2020) Innovating support for research: The coalescence of scholarly communication? College & Research Libraries 81 (2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.2.193.
  42. Peer L., Orr L. V., Coppock A. (2021) Active maintenance: A proposal for the long-term computational reproducibility of scientific results. PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 462–466. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000366.
  43. Perez-Riverol Y., Gatto L., Wang R., Sachsenberg T., Uszkoreit J., Leprevost F. da V., Fufezan C., Ternent T., Eglen S. J., Katz D. S., Pollard T. J., Konovalov A., Flight R. M., Blin K., Vizcaíno J. A. (2016) Ten simple rules for taking advantage of Git and GitHub. PLOS Computational Biology 12 (7): e1004947. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004947.
  44. Rios F. (2016) The pathways of research software preservation: An educational and planning resource for service development. D-Lib Magazine 22 (7/8). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1045/july2016-rios.
  45. Sánchez-Tójar A., Bezine A., Purgar M., Culina A. (2025) Code-sharing policies are associated with increased reproducibility potential of ecological findings. Peer Community Journal 5: e37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.541.
  46. Scheliga K., Pampel H., Konrad U., Fritzsch B., Schlauch T., Nolden M., Zu Castell W., Finke A., Hammitzsch M., Bertuch O., Denker M. (2019) Dealing with research software: Recommendations for best practices. Helmholtz Open Science Coordination Office. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2312/os.helmholtz.003.
  47. Sharma N. K., Ayyala R., Deshpande D., Patel Y., Munteanu V., Ciorba D., Bostan V., Fiscutean A., Vahed M., Sarkar A., Guo R., Moore A., Darci-Maher N., Nogoy N., Abedalthagafi M., Mangul S. (2024) Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research. PeerJ Computer Science 10: e2066. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2066.
  48. Smith A. M., Katz D. S., Niemeyer K. E., FORCE11 Software Citation Working Group (2016) Software citation principles. PeerJ Computer Science 2: e86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86.
  49. Stodden V., Guo P., Ma Z. (2013) Toward reproducible computational research: An empirical analysis of data and code policy adoption by journals. PLoS ONE 8 (6): e67111. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067111.
  50. Stodden V., Seiler J., Ma Z. (2018) An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (11): 2584–2589. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708290115.
  51. UNESCO (2021) UNESCO recommendation on open science. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54677/mnmh8546.
  52. Vlaeminck S. (2021) Dawning of a new age? Economics journals’ data policies on the test bench. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 31 (1): 1–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.10940.
  53. Vlaeminck S., Podkrajac F. (2017) Journals in economic sciences: Paying lip service to reproducible research? IASSIST Quarterly 41 (1–4): 16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6.
  54. Weber N. (2022) Research software publication policy case study. arXiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.05367. Препринт.
  55. Wilkinson M. D., Dumontier M., Aalbersberg I. J., Appleton G., Axton M., Baak A., Blomberg N., Boiten J.-W., da Silva Santos L. B., Bourne P. E., Bouwman J., Brookes A. J., Clark T., Crosas M., Dillo I., Dumon O., Edmunds S., Evelo C. T., Finkers R., Gonzalez-Beltran A., Gray A. J., Groth P., Goble C., Grethe J. S., Heringa J., ’t Hoen P. A., Hooft R., Kuhn T., Kok R., Kok J., Lusher S. J., Martone M. E., Mons A., Packer A. L., Persson B., Rocca-Serra P., Roos M., van Schaik R., Sansone S.-A., Schultes E., Sengstag T., Slater T., Strawn G., Swertz M. A., Thompson M., van der Lei J., van Mulligen E., Velterop J., Waagmeester A., Wittenburg P., Wolstencroft K., Zhao J., Mons B. (2016) The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3 (1): 160018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
  56. Wilson G., Bryan J., Cranston K., Kitzes J., Nederbragt L., Teal T. K. (2017) Good enough practices in scientific computing. PLOS Computational Biology 13 (6): e1005510. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005510.
  57. Wofford M. F., Boscoe B. M., Borgman C. L., Pasquetto I. V., Golshan M. S. (2020) Jupyter notebooks as discovery mechanisms for open science: Citation practices in the astronomy community. Computing in Science & Engineering 22 (1): 5–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2932067.
  58. Zech P., Pekaric I. (2025) Sustaining research software: A fitness function approach. arXiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.10085.

Трищенко Наталия Дмитриевна, отдел научных исследований открытой науки ГПНТБ СО РАН («Библиотека для открытой науки»), 2026 г.
Курс доступен по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).